
Cyrtopogon sp. - specimen "B"
Soooo.... bear with me a little bit, but this is kind of exciting. Last week I posted up a photo of one of these robber flies. I don't know much at all about them so I went to BugGuide for an ID. I was figuring that "w" mark on the back would make it easy. Little did I know... what came back to me from the experts over there was that there is a good possibility that this species is un-described - but I only had that one photo, which wasn't really enough to start to really make that determination.
So - we decided to go back and see if we could catch one. I can't say I was really expecting to be successful.... turns out they are certainly not locally scarce - we saw a number of them and I captured two. They are now up on BugGuide, with more views for the experts to look over and I will be able to take/send them away to an expert as well.
In these photos the flies are still alive... I'm a little paranoid about losing them or damaging them, so forgive the plastic cup background...
I'll post up here as this project continues!

Cyrtopogon longimanus Loew, 1874 is a Robberfly (Asilidae) known from North America. It is closely related to C. marginalis, also known from the eastern U.S. and Canada, sharing a puffed-up, shiny black scutellum, which lines-up with a series of shiny-black spots along the sides of the thorax with that species.
comments (16)
Pudding4brains has been extremely nice and helpful. He gave me tips on how to catch them and a what to do to photograph and preserve them after I did. Posted 7 years ago, modified 7 years ago
The one thing to note is that I don't use the focusing ring on the lens for each shot in a case such as this - that would slightly change the magnification. The lens is set and left at it's maximum extension and all focusing is done by moving the camera.
In the old days you'd make a print of the ruler at the same time you were printing your images and use that to measure out your scale bar (or do the math) - these days you can put the ruler in a layer in Photoshop.
Here's someone doing this in their lab. http://www.photomacrography.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=4030 Posted 7 years ago
Posted 7 years ago
Ahw ... bummer indeed ;o) But good to have gone through the exercise and an interesting result with the regional variation in colour pattern nevertheless. Who knows - it may result in a subspecies or something at some point :o) Could still be interesting to send the samples in to an expert - always good to have such variants in a collection for later examination and also a good thing that these now show on BugGuide under the correct name. So all's well that ends well, I suppose :o)
Cheers, Arp Posted 7 years ago