JungleDragon is a nature and wildlife community for photographers, travellers and anyone who loves nature. We're genuine, free, ad-free and beautiful.

Join

Auletobius anceps The verdict is in: Auletobius anceps.<br />
Some characters/measurements of this beetle:<br />
- Body length (without rostrum) 2,25mm<br />
- Rostrum length ~0.75mm, giving a 0.33 ratio to body length<br />
- The last (claw bearing) tarsal segment is about the same length as the first (not clearly longer as in convexifrons)<br />
- The shape of the antenna segments is up for discussion still (the key and fig.7 in Morris (2004) do not fit my beetle well, but the official redescription of the species (in the same paper) does fit like a glove.<br />
<br />
The relative length of the rostrum is &quot;spot on&quot; for maderensis and a bit iffy-inbetween the published ratios for male and female anceps, but my measurements may not be too precise and the overall body length is too small for maderensis.<br />
<br />
Anyway, I&#039;ve contacted Dr. Morris about all this and he very kindly spent some of his valuable time in helping me out, concluding that he is confident we are looking at Auletobius anceps here.  Auletini,Auletobius,Auletobius anceps,Curculionoidea,Geotagged,La Palma (Canary Islands),Rhynchitidae,Rhynchitinae,Spain Click/tap to enlarge PromotedSpecies introCountry intro

Auletobius anceps

The verdict is in: Auletobius anceps.
Some characters/measurements of this beetle:
- Body length (without rostrum) 2,25mm
- Rostrum length ~0.75mm, giving a 0.33 ratio to body length
- The last (claw bearing) tarsal segment is about the same length as the first (not clearly longer as in convexifrons)
- The shape of the antenna segments is up for discussion still (the key and fig.7 in Morris (2004) do not fit my beetle well, but the official redescription of the species (in the same paper) does fit like a glove.

The relative length of the rostrum is "spot on" for maderensis and a bit iffy-inbetween the published ratios for male and female anceps, but my measurements may not be too precise and the overall body length is too small for maderensis.

Anyway, I've contacted Dr. Morris about all this and he very kindly spent some of his valuable time in helping me out, concluding that he is confident we are looking at Auletobius anceps here.

    comments (10)

  1. So nice photo!
    You mean to say Auletobius?
    Posted 5 years ago
    1. Whoops - yes of course - I stand corrected! Thanks for noticing! Posted 5 years ago
  2. I'm not a specialist, but I've found this document https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/ef57/85526d3d3aae12a83917d73fbe8630ae6ea2.pdf

    Following the key, I find Auletobius maderensis ; you can check to make a stand
    Posted 5 years ago
    1. Hi Claude, thanks - yes I worked that key and I also arrived at maderensis, but it doesn't make sense as that species has never been recorded from the Canary Islands before. The problem is that the drawing of the antenna of A. anceps does not fit the description for the antenna of anceps in the same paper. If the drawing is correct, my beetle might be convexifrons (the length of the tarsus segments is hard to interpret on my images), but if the description is correct, mine would likely be anceps.
      I've tried writing to Dr. Mike Morris (the author of the article) - hope the mail sill arrives at the old address ...
      P.S. there is also a new species described from La Gomera: Auletobius (Canarauletes) garajonay Stüben, 2015 that I have yet to find a PDF for.
      STÜBEN, P.E. (2015) Auletobius (Canarauletes) garajonay sp.n. from La Gomera (Canary Islands) (Coleoptera: Curculionoidea: Rhynchitidae). - SNUDEBILLER - Studies on taxonomy, biology and ecology of Curculionoidea, vol.16.
      Posted 5 years ago, modified 5 years ago
  3. I see you have dug the topic much more deeply than I !
    It's pity that the access to dedicated papers is not always for free...

    However, in Fauna Europea (https://fauna-eu.org/cdm_dataportal/taxon/20ffb75e-bddf-4309-81f7-98009f5e7cd6), they say that A. mederensis can be found from the Canary Islands; But it looks that this site cannot always be trusted.
    Posted 5 years ago
    1. Thanks for helping Claude! I think the "records" for maderensis may still be based on some of the historic confusion stipulated by Morris (2004). For the most current distribution known for the Canary Islands I tend to look at Biota:
      https://www.biodiversidadcanarias.es/biota/especies?pagina=1&searchSpeciesTabs=fastSearchTab&fastSearch=Auletobius
      A friend sent me the paper by Stüben and from that I think I can disregard the new species and I'm more or less back at anceps, but I'll wait and see if Dr. Morris will kindly answer my mail.
      Posted 5 years ago
  4. I'll follow this subject closely and thank you for the link related to Canarias biodiversity ! Posted 5 years ago
    1. Hi Claude, I've added some to the description under the image! :o) Posted 5 years ago
  5. Wow, I'm glad to see that your investigations finally lead to the determination of the species.
    Your photo impresses me even more since I know the size of the beetle...
    Bravo !
    Posted 5 years ago
    1. Thank you for the kind words, Claude :o)
      If you're interested there are some images of details here:
      https://observation.org/waarneming/view/186103569
      Cheers, Arp
      Posted 5 years ago, modified 5 years ago

Sign in or Join in order to comment.

Auletobius anceps is a relatively small Weevil (2-2.7mm, without the rostrum) in the family Rhynchitidae, endemic to some of the Canary Islands.

Similar species: Beetles
Species identified by Pudding4brains
View Pudding4brains's profile

By Pudding4brains

Public Domain
Uploaded Feb 25, 2020. Captured in Kilómetro: 12.700., LP-109, 38728, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain.