
You talkin' to me, tough guy?
I saw giant forest scorpions (genus Heterometrus) in three locations in Sri Lanka, and according to the scorpion experts on iNaturalist they were all three different species. They all looked basically like this, with slight variation in coloration and foot structures I guess.

''Heterometrus indus'', the giant forest scorpion, is a species of scorpions belonging to the family Scorpionidae. It is found only in India and Sri Lanka. It is known to as a fierce carnivorous arthropod for small animals.
Similar species: Scorpions
By John Sullivan
All rights reserved
Uploaded Sep 30, 2019. Captured Aug 8, 2019 11:55 in Matale - Illukkumbura - Pallegama - Giradurukotte Road, Laggala, Sri Lanka.
comments (3)
John, have some taxonomy questions if you don't mind.
- Minor: seems this species and the previous one both share the common name "Giant forest scorpion". Advise on what to do? Give one the common name, if so, which one? Give neither the common name?
- Major: so far we've classified scorpions like this:
https://www.jungledragon.com/wildlife/browse/animalia/arthropoda/arachnida/scorpiones
So....
arthropoda/arachnida/scorpiones
instead of....
arthropoda/chelicerata/scorpiones
The latter is used on your recent species. Just checking if this is deliberate or whether you're OK with me merging this in the first classification. Posted 5 years ago
For the taxonomy question, the import from Wikipedia resulted in different class names for the different species. H. swammerdami is listed on Wikipedia as class Arachnida, but H. indus is listed on Wikipedia as class Chelicerata. So I blame the individual Wikipedia authors for that inconsistency. H. yaleensis doesn't have its own Wikipedia page, so I entered that one manually, copying from the H. indus page that I had just created. I didn't notice the Chelicerata-v-Arachnida issue at all until you mentioned it just now. I have zero opinion on the matter. Probably some people think that Chelicerata should be a class and other people think it should be a subphylum. I definitely agree that JungleDragon should choose one or the other and be consistent, but I don't know anything about the arguments for either, so sticking with the tried-and-true Arachnida seems like an excellent choice. Posted 5 years ago
My understanding is that for Wikipedia it is kind of hard to be fully consistent. In the end, authors there are writing unstructured text, not data-driven texts, despite them having a template system. Posted 5 years ago