
Lasius fuliginosus - exposed, Heesch, Netherlands
Presumed species, I will check it with an expert. Note that I know very little about ants, so I may not use the right jargon in this series, so do correct me where I go wrong.
I normally don't intervene with nature much on my hikes, meaning I don't do a lot of digging or turning over things. Yet on this day I saw a very rotten trunk stuck to the forest floor, so I tipped it over with my shoe, to see if perhaps some woodlice or beetles were below it. To my shock (and yes I felt guilty about it) I exposed a large ant colony and partly destroyed their carefully crafted tunnel system. So let us use my brutality to document about the species what we can.
Ants seemingly don't waste a lot of time complaining about this external event, because the very second they were exposed, hundreds were frantically moving, each knowing exactly what to do next: secure the offspring. In this opening scene you get an overview, yet it doesn't show everything. Faintly in the back you see white larvae but there's more rooms to show.
Closeups of the immediate response:
There's more to the nest, a side view shows a nursery holding the larvae:
Taking a step back, we see multiple of such rooms:
And even a pupa room:
Hundreds of ants, if not thousands. Multiple rooms with larvae, at least one visible room with pupas. Cleaned up in minutes, not a single ant, larvae or pupa in sight, as if nothing happened:
Some individuals:

Lasius fuliginosus is a species of ant in the subfamily Formicinae. Workers have a black shiny colour and a length of about 4–6 mm, females are larger and small males reach a length of 4.5–5 mm. The head is heart-shaped.
comments (17)
The gastor of Lasius fuliginosus has a more pronounced and translucent rings on it:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lasius_fuliginosus#/media/File:Lasius_fuliginosus.jpg
Whereas the species you saw had a smoother gaster and less banding. It also looks like the spine is thicker on this ant compared to the Lasius:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camponotus_vagus#/media/File:Camponotus_vagus.jpg
Great pics though, I'm sure the ants will have got over their trauma now and re-decorated their home :)
My messor barbarus colony goes crazy if it senses a sudden vibration (dropping something on the floor, despite the fact their nest is on a table, on carpet!). They all run out of the nest carrying the babies and then about 5 minutes later, they all file back in as if nothing happened.
Posted 7 years ago
Thanks so much for looking into this. Camponotus Vagus looks like a better visual match, but here's the thing: it is listed as extremely rare in the Netherlands. Waarneming.nl (the main dutch observation platform only has a single spotting). Additional dutch articles report that an enthousiast once introduced a nest to the Netherlands, but it failed. Other than this, it has never been found in the wild.
So this means that I totally hope that you're right, because that would make this a very rare observation that may be of interest to some locals. However, before declaring that victory, I hope you don't mind we try to be sure. I've uploaded a collage with a closeup of some individuals. None are really sharp, but I'm hoping it may help in confirming the ID (or challenging it):
How sure would you be about Camponotus Vagus? Any competing candidates that could also qualify?
Hereby also sharing a great key-based ant finder:
https://determineren.nederlandsesoorten.nl/linnaeus_ng/app/views/matrixkey/index.php?epi=108
It's in dutch but works quite visually. I don't think they're even listing Camponotus Vagus as an outcome, this is why I want to double-check.
Hope it's not a bother! Posted 7 years ago
I'll check when I finish work today for you so I can actually put some time into it - on a customer site at the moment testing - don't think they would understand if I told them that I was trying to ID an ant species, which let's face it, is infinitely more exciting than the testing I'm currently doing!!!
I certainly think we are on the right track with the 'Camponotus' species, just a case of narrowing down exactly which one it is :)
http://www.antwiki.org/wiki/Netherlands
^^ This is the site I'll be looking at later. Posted 7 years ago, modified 7 years ago
Joking of course, no rush. Thank you for any time you're willing to put into it. I've also posted these photos on a dutch FB group, I'll keep this thread updated if they mention anything. Posted 7 years ago
2 experts confirming this is possibly/likely Camponotus Vagus. One of them showed this interesting map of the very few observations know for this species:
https://scontent-amt2-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/38639302_2182398798691256_8826048293088788480_o.jpg?_nc_cat=0&oh=76551e71f05db08b303fa5006f07d645&oe=5BC97600
The paper is fresh, from 2018. One of those dots in the bottom middle is exactly where I found them: Heeswijk-Dinther, province of Noord-Brabant.
I've also posted on a dutch ant forum which should have many experts. Just trying to maximize certainty as I may report this find to some other dutch nature websites and don't want to make a false report. Posted 7 years ago
- Camponotus Vagus typically have different sized workers, this nest not really
- He thinks the build of these ants are more like the Lasius genus.
Specifically he thinks it's likely Lasius brunneus. Posted 7 years ago, modified 7 years ago
The remark about different sized workers seems strong to me. Your remarks on the gaster are claimed by them to not be a good key for determination, or at least not a decisive key. They both say this.
What do you think about the remark regarding size of workers?
I should say that statistically speaking, the odds are very strongly against Camponotus Vagus. Digging deeper into these forums you see people speaking about a single surviving nest in the entire country. The total amount of known nests in recent decades is less than 10.
I would be a one in a million chance to accidentally discover a new unknown nest. It would be breaking news in some niche communities. That's why the claim for Camponotus Vagus needs really strong arguments in favor of it. I'm not sure if that is possible, but if you're willing to have a deeper look, I would be very thankful. Posted 7 years ago
Another expert strongly rejects the idea of Camponotus Vagus. Although hard to decipher from a photo, size makes Camponotus Vagus unmistakable, as well as long hairs near some of the ridges of the abdomen, not seen here. Furthermore, he too claims Camponotus has different sized workers not seen here.
His suggestion is Lasius fuliginosus. Which kind of matches in size, appearance, distribution, nest type, many things.
I think he may be on to something, what do you think? Posted 7 years ago
Certainly some good points to consider and I don't mind admitting if I am wrong. I have no personal experience with this particular species but if the majority (who are probably more experienced than I) identify them as lasius, all seems good to me :) Posted 7 years ago
For now I'll change back the species but still invite you to have a closer look if interested. I don't see anything as "wrong", it's just exchanging ideas and reason to come to the most likely answer. Posted 7 years ago
Well....I'm at a loss now. Posted 7 years ago