
Spotted Longicorn (Eburophora octoguttata) -male
An attractive dark brown longicorn with medium-length black antennae and thick femurs. Elytra had small pale yellow spots. The beetle would have been about 18 to 20 mm long.
Spotted on black wattle (Acacia mearnsii) - in a national park.
My thanks to WildFlower and Martin Lagerway for their help with the ID.
Note that this particular specimen is a somewhat aberrant colour form with extra spots as compared to the usual "factory issue" Eburophora octoguttata.

Eburophora octoguttata White, 1855 is a medium sized Longhorn Beetle (Cerambycidae) endemic to south-eastern Australia. It has been reared from various species of Acacia (A. decurrens, A. irrorata and A. melanoxylon).
comments (9)
https://apps2.cdfa.ca.gov/publicApps/plant/bycidDB/wdetails.asp?id=20169&w=o
http://www.ento.csiro.au/biology/cerambycidae/info_pages/Eburophora.html
https://bie.ala.org.au/species/urn:lsid:biodiversity.org.au:afd.taxon:e543239b-9d28-41fd-8931-c5380322824d
https://books.google.bg/books?id=d9OfDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA134&lpg=PA134&dq=Eburophora&source=bl&ots=XtqnLTR2b_&sig=7Resk53tNtIpsrADgxiDJvYeOv4&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwirx6ijo83WAhWCd5oKHb7eAsQQ6AEISjAH#v=onepage&q=Eburophora&f=false Posted 7 years ago, modified 7 years ago
https://bie.ala.org.au/species/urn:lsid:biodiversity.org.au:afd.taxon:b61c9d59-61e9-48fd-9669-916c4d465601#classification
It cannot be the first species according to the Longicorn volume by A Slipinski (P 408). E. octoguttata is the only possible described species. I am confident this is correct. Posted 7 years ago
If it is an Eburophora it just might be an as yet undocumented colour aberration, or maaaayyyyybeeee even an undescribed new species (???) so they _might_ just be interested in the critter too. Then again, maybe it's something completely different or a well known colour form and I was just to daft to find it :o)
Anyway, @Leuba : It probably wouldn't hurt if you could find a specimen with this pattern again and collect it?!
Cheers, Arp Posted 7 years ago, modified 7 years ago
That said, as Hermes Escalona mentioned in his reply, it is always good to be able to study various details of aberrant specimen up close and personal to double check for a possible new species ... ;o)
Cheers, Arp
P.S. I've uploaded the image by White (1855) to also document the standard markings on JD:
Thank you for your persistence and taking the trouble to write to the authors. Now we not only know that it is E.octoguttata but that it is not common and is one of a few ( ? 2 )on record. I must thank WildFlower and Martin Lagerwey for their help once again.
Thank you ! Posted 7 years ago
http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/20061841
pictured as Plate VIII fig.7 :
http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/20061928
recent images by Slipinski & Escalona here:
https://apps2.cdfa.ca.gov/publicApps/plant/bycidDB/wdetails.asp?id=20169&w=o
The original description of E. eburata (as Sophron eburatus, Pascoe 1865) from South Australia is here:
http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/13387976
images by Slipinski & Escalona here:
https://apps2.cdfa.ca.gov/publicApps/plant/bycidDB/wdetails.asp?id=20168&w=o
Waterhouse moves S.eburata to the genus Eburophora in 1874:
http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/14921890
From this, it seems that the still valid genus Sophron and Eburophora would probably be quite similar in appearance, but there is only one Aussie species (Sophron inornatus) with a recent image here :
https://apps2.cdfa.ca.gov/publicApps/plant/bycidDB/wdetails.asp?id=20238&w=o
So back to the two Eburophora. To me the pattern on the photo is sufficiently different from both Eburophora to become somewhat suspicious ... maybe we should try to key out the species with the excellent key available here? :
https://books.google.nl/books?id=d9OfDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA19
Or with the website on Australian Cerambycidae:
http://www.ento.csiro.au/biology/cerambycidae/cerambycidae.html
Posted 7 years ago, modified 7 years ago