JungleDragon is a nature and wildlife community for photographers, travellers and anyone who loves nature. We're genuine, free, ad-free and beautiful.

Join

Blue butterfly, Ankarana, Madagascar This is a hasty shot with my zoom lens, I was not quick enough to switch to macro. I&#039;m posting it for the species value.<br />
Identification theory so far is some kind of hairstreak Lycaenidae -&gt; Polyommatinae. Africa,Ankarana,Geotagged,Hemiolaus ceres,Madagascar,Madagascar North,Spring,World Click/tap to enlarge Species introCountry intro

Blue butterfly, Ankarana, Madagascar

This is a hasty shot with my zoom lens, I was not quick enough to switch to macro. I'm posting it for the species value.
Identification theory so far is some kind of hairstreak Lycaenidae -> Polyommatinae.

    comments (13)

  1. I love hairstreaks, evolution gone mad!

    Dave
    Posted 9 years ago
    1. Lol yes, but this one confuses me. It's fat like a skipper, yet blue, and has hairstreaks. Posted 9 years ago
  2. I think it is a Theclinae, maybe Hemiolaus sp. but without the ventral side of the wings it would probably not be possible to discriminate between them. Posted 9 years ago
    1. I believe you are right. In the total list of butterflies of Madagascar, I saw a few suspects in that sub family, but as photos are lacking for several species, I could not find something specific. This is the only shot I have, sorry. Posted 9 years ago
      1. Well, you were lucky! The hardest shot to get from a hairstreak is the wings open. When I get close enough for a shot, they turn their backs on me, shuffle their wings and wiggle their wands in my face.

        Dave
        Posted 9 years ago
  3. Hemiolaus ceres is a very good match.

    Dave
    Posted 9 years ago
    1. Thanks! I'm going to go for that for now. Posted 9 years ago
    2. How can you tell that it is not Hemiolaus cobaltina or Hemiolaus maryra? Posted 9 years ago
      1. The features that I used were;
        The front wing rear profile. The cutback shape is unique.
        The pointed profile of the rear wing trailing edge.
        The bump on the rear wing trailing edge.
        The comparative lengths of the trailers.
        The difference in color shade between the front and rear wings.

        Many of these chosen features are common amongst ceres, cobaltina and maryra.

        Cobaltina has prominent black spots at rear wing trailing edge.

        I failed to find a reliable image of maryra.

        Dave
        Posted 9 years ago
        1. I only got 1 reference for H. ceres (male and female) but I don't know how reliable it is and 1 for H. cobaltina. All the others are of the azure haistreak (Hemiolaus caeculus) which is not found in Madagascar.
          http://www.neutron.phys.ethz.ch/Lepidoptera/Lycaenidae.htm
          http://www.neutron.phys.ethz.ch/Lepidoptera/Collecting/2012-2013/Madagascar2013/AZ13-0490R.jpg
          http://www.neutron.phys.ethz.ch/Lepidoptera/Collecting/2012-2013/Madagascar2013/AZ13-0479R.jpg
          http://www2.nrm.se/en/lep_nrm/c/hypolycaena_cobaltina.html
          http://www.metamorphosis.org.za/articlesPDF/1218/265%20Genus%20Hemiolaus%20Aurivillius.pdf

          The other references that should be reliable are some old descriptions (most of them in French) and drawings.
          http://ftp.funet.fi/index/Tree_of_life/insecta/lepidoptera/ditrysia/papilionoidea/lycaenidae/theclinae/hemiolaus/

          http://archive.org/stream/illustrationsofd01hewi#page/n86/mode/1up
          This is supposed to be the original description of H. ceres, however it was collected in South Africa so it should be H. caeculus instead. Plate 17 with the figure is missing.

          Here the first reference says that in the second one H. caeculus should be H. cobaltina so all 3 species are described and drawn in the same paper.
          http://archive.org/stream/rhopalocerathi00auri#page/316/mode/1up
          http://archive.org/stream/histoirephysique1819gran#page/230/mode/1up
          http://archive.org/stream/histoirephysique1819gran#page/231/mode/1up
          http://archive.org/stream/histoirephysique1819gran#page/238/mode/1up
          http://archive.org/stream/histoirephysique1819gran#page/n450/mode/1up
          http://archive.org/stream/histoirephysique1819gran#page/n452/mode/1up

          According to the descriptions both H. maryra and H. ceres have darker forewings and light blue hindwings. In H. ceres they are described as having violet and greenish reflections respectively. H. maryra has a small black line on the hindwings that is probably hidden between the wings. The other difference is in the spot in the base of the anal tail, but we cannot see it here. If you compare drawings 1 and 3 on plate 30a they are not so different.
          In the first reference there is a ? is H. maryra = Iolaus ceres?

          I agree it is probably not H. cobaltina. If H. ceres and H. maryra are different, we cannot see the different parts on this photo. Based on the colour difference, the hindwings are not greenish so it may be H. maryra but this is just speculating without a reliable reference.
          Posted 9 years ago
          1. The neutron ceres image was the most convincing for me, and such a high quality too.

            http://www.neutron.phys.ethz.ch/Lepidoptera/Collecting/2012-2013/Madagascar2013/AZ13-0490R.jpg

            Everything matched Ferdy’s image, even the diagonal vein, just forward of the shaped trailing edge.

            The female had enough similarities in the details to convince me that it was the same species; vein layout, trailer size and coloring. But with significant differences that cast doubt on the species, like the front wing trailing edge and the rear wing ocelli. Rear wing black edging, similar to the caeculus image.

            I think the cobalt is out of the equation.

            The caeculus image looks so close, but there are features that would account for species difference; the black edging of the rear wing, wrong sized trailers, dark patches on the front wing at rear inboard.

            If the neutron ceres male is correct, then I believe Ferdy’s is a match. If the image names are in doubt, then we are screwed.

            The drawings of ceres and maryra are disappointing, in that neither of them match the front wing trailing edge profile. The entomologist’s assistant needs a slap. I think the broadness of the front wing pattern could be significant, it could also be a wet season thing though.

            This series of butterflies are obviously all evolved from the same stock before Madagascar split. The species may have split before Madagascar became isolated, or the central range of mountains could have promoted a species split, but I haven’t looked into this. DNA analysis of a proper collection is required to put this one to bed. But for now, it is all down to which images you trust.

            Dave
            Posted 9 years ago
            1. Looking at the neutron image again, it has the black line on the hindwings of H. maryra, doesn't it? Looking at the ventral side of it, it has more strait lines like H. maryra, but I am not so sure about it. The description also says that all 4 lines of the forewing of H. maryra are red while the smaller 2 towards the base of H. ceres are brownish red. They look all the same colour to me. So maybe what we've got is a H. maryra. If only we had a specimen of the other species to compare, it might have been easier. Posted 9 years ago
              1. I don't have an image of maryra.

                I think we have gone as far as we can with our web resources. We need to get input from a Madagascar expert.

                DAve
                Posted 9 years ago

Sign in or Join in order to comment.

''Hemiolaus ceres'' is a butterfly in the Lycaenidae family. It is found on Madagascar. The habitat consists of forests.

Similar species: Moths And Butterflies
Species identified by Ferdy Christant
View Ferdy Christant's profile

By Ferdy Christant

All rights reserved
Uploaded May 4, 2016. Captured Oct 16, 2015 10:08 in 6, Madagascar.
  • NIKON D800
  • f/5.6
  • 1/200s
  • ISO100
  • 400mm