JungleDragon is a nature and wildlife community for photographers, travellers and anyone who loves nature. We're genuine, free, ad-free and beautiful.

Join

Bringing home breakfast I know this osprey quite well.  This osprey has made his nest with his mate in the same spot in a very large county park in St. Petersburg, FL adjacent to a parking lot where I often park when I do a training session on my bike.  The regulars call him “Fleck” due to a fleck at the 7 o’clock position of his right eye.  I often photograph him and on this day, I was photographing an owls nest about a mile away and stopped by to see if their was any action at the osprey nest.  I found him sitting on a power line with a fish and knowing that he is uncomfortable around people and other birds when he has caught a fish, I readied my camera for action.  He did not disappoint and took off towards his adjacent nest and I started firing my camera.  I filmed a complete sequence in which the bird landed on the nest and fed the fish to his waiting mate which the locals have named Jewel.  When I got home and was uploading my images, I almost fell off my chair when I saw that I had made this amazing capture of the bird with his wings in the so-called angel wing position, making direct eye contact t with me and clutching a fish in one talon - a one in a million capture!!  Osprey,Pandion haliaetus,birds,birds of prey,osprey,osprey in flight,osprey with fish,raptors Click/tap to enlarge

Bringing home breakfast

I know this osprey quite well. This osprey has made his nest with his mate in the same spot in a very large county park in St. Petersburg, FL adjacent to a parking lot where I often park when I do a training session on my bike. The regulars call him “Fleck” due to a fleck at the 7 o’clock position of his right eye. I often photograph him and on this day, I was photographing an owls nest about a mile away and stopped by to see if their was any action at the osprey nest. I found him sitting on a power line with a fish and knowing that he is uncomfortable around people and other birds when he has caught a fish, I readied my camera for action. He did not disappoint and took off towards his adjacent nest and I started firing my camera. I filmed a complete sequence in which the bird landed on the nest and fed the fish to his waiting mate which the locals have named Jewel. When I got home and was uploading my images, I almost fell off my chair when I saw that I had made this amazing capture of the bird with his wings in the so-called angel wing position, making direct eye contact t with me and clutching a fish in one talon - a one in a million capture!!

    comments (30)

  1. That is indeed a wonderful capture! I have to ask though...did you change the background? Part of the image look somewhat unnatural. Posted 10 years ago
    1. Yes, the story on this shot, which has won many contests and was taken this March, is that the natural background is a blue sky with clouds, and in that it is my favorite shot of all time, I have done it with numerous sky backgrounds and this is my favorite which is full page in the current issue of Popular Photography magazine having won the 2014 Popular Photography/NY Institute of photography annual contest. National Geographic loved it, but I sent it to them with the natural sky which something they demand. Not sure how people feel here, but there is always room for artistic expression as long as the subject is not enhanced. Posted 10 years ago
      1. Thanks for explaining, I was just wondering, changing a photo's composition is allowed here, although uncommon. Posted 10 years ago
        1. Everyone has an opinion on the subject. When I send stuff into places like Outdoor Photographer or Nat Geo, I send the originals. Other than that, I go with what I think makes for the most interesting presentation in that I consider photography to be an art form. Again, to the important thing is that the subject is presented as it was captured, but there is a contingent that demands that everything be exactly as it was, and I think there is room for both opinions. Where I get put off is when someone writes me a nasty note chastising me for something along these lines. Posted 10 years ago
        2. Thanks again, I will be entering this shot in a big contest (32nd annual) in which I went best of show with my "Direct Eye Contact with a Cormorant," which was one of my first few postings here. That show requires that no post processing is allowed beyond the normal tweaks made with the original RAW file. For that show, I will be entering the original with the bland sky background, but this one plays very nicely in venues where PP is allowed. Posted 10 years ago
          1. Good luck with that contest, and of course this one :) Posted 10 years ago
        3. Thanks, the contest notification was how I found out about this site yesterday - great site!! Posted 10 years ago
          1. Thank you, feel free to tell your friends :) Posted 10 years ago
      2. I was wondering about that background too, the light is different. I noticed that on a few other photos as well. Can you post a link to the original background if you have it uploaded sowhere else? Posted 10 years ago
        1. Here is the link to the original posted on my ViewBug account:

          http://www.viewbug.com/photo/13238571
          Posted 10 years ago
          1. Thanks! I must say I am not a big fan of changing the composition of a photo. In this case, with such an amazing subject, I don't think the background makes much difference as long as it is contrasting to the subject. The only reason we are discussing it now is because we could tell that it was changed and it somehow distracted us from the main subject. Well, different people like different things. Well done capturing the bird anyway, as well as the whole collection. Posted 10 years ago
        2. Regarding the issue of post processing, it of course has passionate opinions on both side. The thing about the version that I put up was that it blew away the faculty at the New York Institute of Photography and it won me a 4 figure free professional photography course. A version of it sold for $250 in Nashville last month after making the juried finals of a show and being displayed in a museum. It has also sold on my Society6 account and people just seem to love it. I do get your point about the distraction however which is an excellent point. BTW, when I shot the photo, I had no way of knowing I had made that capture, and when I was uploading the morning's shoot, I almost fell off my chair when this one came off the SD card. I probably have a 100 different shots of this specific osprey (Fleck) taken over a long period of time in that I visit his nest as often as possible and I can always count on him being around, although his mate Jewel is often off somewhere else, but she shows up at breeding season and they had some wonderful chicks this year which I photographed with both parents in the nest, Also in the nest is my significant other's flip-flops which they stole! :) Posted 10 years ago
          1. Thanks for elaborating further. I think in this community, most people are fairly neutral about it, and as said, it is allowed. It is generally appreciated to at least mention it, but not obligatory. Posted 10 years ago
  2. whatever… retracted never said nothing, you are the best ever Posted 10 years ago, modified 10 years ago
    1. Obviously, you are entitled to your opinion, but the largest and oldest photography magazine in the world, Popular Photography liked it enough for it to be selected by their staff and the instructors at the NY Institute of Photography as the winner of their annual 2014 contest! But then again, they don't have very valid opinions I guess. The there was the dumb ass that paid $250 last month when this was a juried finalist in a competition and when displayed in a museum in Nashville, immediately sold unnumbered and unsigned. I have posted this shot with the original sky elsewhere and when certain venues such as National Geographic, who demand original scenes, I act appropriately. They used my original for promotion of their 2014 annual photo contest. I don't why I am bothering to write this because I certainly don't have to explain my "art" to anyone. You like, hate it, disregard it, do whatever you want with it, but leave me the hell alone! BTW, in 2014 I took first place in 39 photo contests and made the top 3 in 137 so I guess I must be doing something right - at least in the eyes of those who are not as expertise as you in the art of photography. You know what, I have god damn had it here and you have seen my last photograph - you are the second person to rattle my cage in two days and two strikes and you are out! :( Posted 10 years ago
      1. …... Posted 10 years ago, modified 10 years ago
        1. I must have taken a wrong turn or something. I know that there are many photographic websites in which criticism is solicited - I saw no evidence that this was one of them. If one wants their work critiqued they can upload there shots to the Nature Photographer's Network which has a plethora of alleged experts who even after being told that you did something for a very specific reason, they still criticize. One of my favorites is that my shot of a cormorant which I believe was the second one I posted here was criticized. Soon thereafter, it went Best of Show in a 31st annual, 7 division photo contest, was published in the December issue of Outdoor Photography magazine (for which they paid me $400 for a one-time use) and will soon be seen in the book, "Best of Photography 2014." It has won over 400 awards on the Viewbug photographic site. So much for the experts.

          In regards to what you had to say, by the nature of this site, I would think that common courtesy would dictate that if you don't have anything positive to say about someone's work, then shut your pie-hole, in that if I wanted advice, it would not be from a medical photographer - it would be from a real photographer. I think we ought to drop this, in that obviously there is no way to get through to someone with your extraordinary talent and taste in photographic art. BTW, the photo that you dislike so much hangs in very large size printed on canvas in my living room and everyone that comes over stops to admire it. It will also be touring Greece this year, but what they hell do they know - they should have consulted with you obviously. I'm out of here!
          Posted 10 years ago
          1. I normally try to stay out of such discussions, but am tempted to chip in on this one, I hope you don't mind...

            Regarding courtesy, in this community it is OK to constructively criticize photography. ideally, that is done in a helpful and friendly way. So no, people do not have to shut up unless they have only positive things to say. They can express criticism. It is not the main goal of the site, but they can. And I hope they express this criticism constructively, and in a helpful way.

            Sometimes it is not friendly, or perhaps not perceived as friendly. I rarely see that happening here, but it may happen. In such cases, my personal advise is to have a thick skin, as a photographer. Agree to disagree, and move on. Also realize that a negative comment on a photo not necessarily is an attack on you as a photographer, or the skill that you have. As soon as we get that personal, we stop learning. We're criticizing persons then, not photos.

            From what I sense in this situation, I see that you have an outspoken photography style, or better said, post processing style. A style that people either love or hate. This is true for almost anybody doing explicit HDR, in any community. Regardless, I see and believe that people do enjoy your photography and the wildlife moments you capture, it's just the post processing that is a little controversial. Rationally, a lot of people, also in this community, like your photography in a general way, yet a few dislike the way it is post processed. I don't see much wrong with that situation.

            Bottom line, it should be OK to agree to disagree in a friendly manner.
            Posted 10 years ago
  3. Ferdy, it almost sounds like I do extreme HDR and everything I submit is highly processed. There are many sites that invite criticism and I would think if a site does not particularly exist for that, common courtesy would dictate that one would keep unsolicited negative criticism to themselves. I used to be on NPN, but even though I would state in advance that I did something for a certain reason, "experts" would come out of the woodwork to tell me otherwise. I am a recent graduate of the NY Institute of Photography course in pro photography so I know the rules, but often try to make my own statement. I look at many photos every day - not to emulate them, but to not be like them and do my own thing. I know the rule of thirds, but I might choose to not use it. Two things particularly bothered me here:

    1) This is the second person with an attitude like this I have encountered in my very short stay here.

    2) This particular photo has accomplished the following since being shot 9+ months ago:


    1st Place 2014 Annual Popular Photography/NYIT Photo Contest

    Published Popular Photography – December 2014

    Jury Selection 2014 annual Art4Apes show – Miami Beach, FL

    Jury Selection 2014 Insight For Healing Hearts

    Displayed Cumberland Gallery, Nashville, TN – Sold for $250

    10 first place finishes in photo competitions – 2014

    Jury selected finalist – Audubon Society of Greater Denver 2014 photo contest

    The photo has caused a stir on Gurushots, I Shot It, and won numerous awards on the Viewbug site.

    It also happens to be my favorite photo of all time and I started shooting in the late 1940s at the age of 9! So of all photos, this is the last one I have any interest in hearing the negative opinion of some critic whose work, BTW, is anything but sterling - especially considering he is an alleged professional photographer.

    Bottom line: I need a break from this site, which I WAS greatly enjoying!


    Posted 10 years ago
    1. "and I would think if a site does not particularly exist for that, common courtesy would dictate that one would keep unsolicited negative criticism to themselves."

      And this is where we disagree. To me, common courtesy also includes constructive and helpful criticism. The fact you that you keep listing your accomplishments means to me that you're taking things very personal. Nobody is criticizing you as a person or as a photographer, it's just 2 people that said something about 2 particular photos in which you made particular post processing choices. It's not the end of the world, it's not "an attitude", it's just genuine feedback that some people don't like what you did to those photos. So what? I don't understand why it is so hard to just accept such feedback, to agree to disagree. If just this tiny amount of somewhat negative feedback already throws you of so far, I think you will struggle in many photo communities.

      And again, the style you sometimes use is entirely yours, but composition changes and heavy HDR invites criticism. It comes with the style. People love it or hate it. It comes with the choice, thus getting remarks on it is to be expected.
      Posted 10 years ago
      1. Well, all this being said, and especially about this particular shot is that I just got the news moments ago, that this exact shot won first prize out of 1895 considered for Best Photo of 2014 on Pixoto:

        http://www.pixoto.com/challenges/best-2014

        That is my point! Do I give a whit about the criticism of a photo that is highly acclaimed and has just won it's 10th first place in large competitions? NO!!!!!!! BTW, I do just fine in the other photo communities in which I take part. I have just completed a year on ViewBug where I have won 11853 awards including 4 granted by the management. I have yet to have a negative comment and I have uploaded 1590 photos! Here, I wind up facing two "expert" critics in my first couple of days on the site!

        http://www.viewbug.com/member/sandyscott_0995#/sandyscott_0995/awards?filter=vbawards
        Posted 10 years ago, modified 10 years ago
        1. I think you're contradicting yourself. You claim to not give a damn that people do not like your style (2 in total), yet here you are getting so defensive at it and threatening to leave. Over just TWO pieces of criticism. It proves the total opposite, being that you are very sensitive to criticism and that your response to it comes across as quite extreme (overly obsessing on accomplishments, threatening to leave). You also seem to have trouble distinguishing between criticism on a single piece of work and a person, as you seem to take all criticism as criticism on yourself, your entire portfolio, style and reputation.

          That's not what it really was. You had feedback on 2 photos, both of which had their backgrounds replaced, with some additional HDR-like effects. 2 people did not like it....so what?

          Regardless of which community, I do not believe that this is the stance a photographer should take. I believe in having a thick skin, being open to criticism and learning from it. That could be just me though. If it is true as you say that so many people love it, and 2 people don't, what is the big deal? Why can't a simple "thanks for the feedback, but I disagree" be the response? Why do you have to be so shielded from any negative comments? It's not even in your own interest to have only people around you who compliment you.

          Posted 10 years ago
  4. Oh and yes, I happen to be my own worst critic. For example, one of my discards that I was encouraged to enter into the December photo contest on Paint My Photo, won first place. I thought the photo stunk, but others obviously liked it enough to vote it into first place. What I am trying to say, is that I know when there are issues with my work and I am always working and practicing to get it right. I do this for relaxation - not to make money or raise my blood pressure! Posted 10 years ago
  5. Hey Pal, I did understand your point and that you were frustrated by my comment, I apologized and I deleted it.
    You don't have to be rude with your "expert" critics words, you just show us now that you behave like a kid who wants to win everything or can't take constructed criticisms. I am glad you managed to win all those contests!! Congratulations! But you know what? that winnings list or whatever is just a bit too much. What are you expecting here? I will tell you my opinion. For me the site is the pinnacle between the pictures and the species discovery. It gives us the opportunity to do both: trying to show some of our best pictures, and learning about wildlife and species.
    That is why I am really attached to a real view of what we take in picture, I accept post-processing but too is too much.
    You want my expertise? well, here what I was thinking it was a bit too much.
    On the pictures you can see that you didn't even controlled properly the sky post processing, we can still see some "bad coloring", and the contours of the pictures are also a bit hazardous no? Is it what you learnt in your NY Institute of Photography?

    http://s8.postimg.org/jp5tu358l/24442_medium.jpg

    http://s28.postimg.org/6slq5mcwd/24442_medium_2.jpg

    Affectionate pair of Lori Parrots  Australian parrots,Rainbow Lorikeet,Rainbow lorikeet,Trichoglossus haematodus,Trichoglossus moluccanus,lori parrots,parrots,small parrots
    Posted 10 years ago, modified 10 years ago
    1. Well my expert critic, apparently not everyone agrees with you in that just this morning, I was informed that my photo that you criticize and dislike so much won "Best Photo of 2014" on Pixoto out of 1895 entrants. Good thing I don't follow your expert guidance! Anyway, let's just drop it - I have better things to do.

      http://www.pixoto.com/challenges/best-2014
      Posted 10 years ago
      1. You are blind and obtuse enough to don't even read me, and so realise that I wasn't at all talking about your Ô such incredible Osprey picture.
        And you love you so much to repeat again and again how fabulous you were.
        Yet I was gentle with you, I even gave some details in image.
        Never mind, like you said...do something else!
        Cheers and happy new year.
        Posted 10 years ago, modified 10 years ago
        1. So true, I don't read you and BTW, if you say "Cheers" I presume you are in the UK. You can see 7 of my photos which will be touring in the show "Wildlife of the World" sponsored by the Photographic Angle. It will be in 7 different cities in the UK for 5 days in each city. But I do have so much I can learn from you! Oh and yes, my work will also be touring Greece in 2015 from another contest that I entered. Now back to studying, and putting a magnifying glass on other people's work. Get a life! Posted 10 years ago
      2. With this comment, and the one below it, you have crossed a line:

        - You're insulting another member who posts constructive criticism
        - You only tolerate positive comments, and act aggressively at perfectly normal feedback
        - Your repeated and extreme self promotion is embarrassing and far from the point of this community

        As a result, you are disqualified from the contest, and also banned from JungleDragon alltogether, effective immediately. You may contact me privately if you want to further discuss the matter, or if you would like to take down your photos.

        To be clear, it is not your photography but your behavior that got you banned. You are entitled to that behavior, but it simply does not fit here. Not even close.

        I don't enjoy taking this measure at all, it's a real shame, but I see no other way. I wish you the best of luck in other communities.
        Posted 10 years ago, modified 10 years ago
    2. Thank you for trying to explain your feedback once again, even though it has fallen on deaf ears. I have taken a measure to ban pedalmasher. Let's move on with sharing wildlife in less selfish ways, as the rest of this community enjoys and does so well. Posted 10 years ago
      1. No worries...it was just sad.
        Thanks for what you do here!
        Let's move on!
        Posted 10 years ago

Sign in or Join in order to comment.

The osprey, also called sea hawk, river hawk, and fish hawk, is a diurnal, fish-eating bird of prey with a cosmopolitan range. It is a large raptor reaching more than 60 cm in length and 180 cm across the wings. It is brown on the upperparts and predominantly greyish on the head and underparts.

Similar species: Diurnal Birds Of Prey
Species identified by pedalmasher
View pedalmasher's profile

By pedalmasher

All rights reserved
Uploaded Dec 31, 2014. Captured Mar 4, 2014 13:03.
  • Canon EOS 70D
  • f/5.6
  • 1/2048s
  • ISO125
  • 400mm