Scoliacma nana

- No description given -

comments (6)

Ferdy Christant

Lion

Brunia looks close but it seems wider and the outer bands are thicker. My theory would be Palaeosia bicosta, give it a thought. Posted 2 years ago
1. Calbost Niel
  
  Lion
  
  Thanks Ferdy Posted 2 years ago
2. Christine Young
  
  Lion
  
  Scoliacma nana might also be an option. Your moth doesn't seem to have the 2 colors (dark orange and white) that run along the costa like Palaeosia bicosta has.
  
  https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/112955054
  https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/149528644
  https://bie.ala.org.au/species/https://biodiversity.org.au/afd/taxa/9dfccfa1-9fe0-4940-b50b-39e54811ba64#gallery
  https://www.gbif.org/species/10074808 Posted 2 years ago
3. 1. Ferdy Christant
    
    Lion
    
    The better candidate, wasn't even aware of it. Thanks! Posted 2 years ago
  2. 1. Christine Young
      
      Lion
      
      You're welcome. Posted 2 years ago
    2. 1. Calbost Niel
        
        Lion
        
        Thanks Christine Posted 2 years ago

The Scoliacma nana

"Scoliacma nana" is a moth of the family Erebidae first described by Francis Walker in 1854. It is found in the Australian states of New South Wales and Queensland.

Info 1 0

Similar species: Moths And Butterflies

Species identified by Ferdy Christant