Similar species: Beetles
By Ferdy Christant
All rights reserved
Uploaded Aug 21, 2022. Captured Aug 20, 2022 21:52.
JungleDragon is a nature and wildlife community for photographers, travellers and anyone who loves nature. We're genuine, free, ad-free and beautiful.
comments (6)
This one was reasonably clean. I start with this small hand pump (not sure what its called) to blow off loose dust. Typically this doesn't do that much as most dust is not that loose, but it only takes a few secs.
Then, if it's not a very hairy subject, I submerge it in warmish water with dish soap and rock it back and forth. If I'm not in a rush to process it, I may just leave it in this water for hours, but I'm becoming more conservative in doing this. The water may expel new fluids from the specimen, which then dry up and get stuck, making the situation worse. When I can already tell that the subject has very sticky dirt, I use Decon90 instead of water, such as on this subject:
(had to do two rounds of Decon90 on that one)
My latest gotcha is that none of the above things do much...if you don't SCRUB. Most dirt is not loose and soaking will only remove a small part of it. So I have these tiny sticks with a tiny cotton-like tip at the end that I use for that. It doesn't leave behind any fibers. I dip it in water (or Decon 90) and then scrub very carefully. When done, rinse, otherwise you only moved the dirt.
Drying after the above: preferably overnight or half a day. It looks dry after an hour, but very much isn't. Posted 3 years ago
Very good point about the scrubbing! More often than not, a little dip in soapy water isn't enough. The initial reason that I rarely wash specimens is because so many of my earlier ones were old and barely made it through the photo session. They would have disintegrated in a bath. But, I should consider it for any specimens I buy because many are covered in crusty dirt that is really plastered on. Posted 3 years ago
That said, the need for advanced cleaning strongly depends on magnification. A lot of dirt only becomes visible at higher magnifications so if not doing that, keep it simple, I'd say. Posted 3 years ago