
Marmalade Hover Fly, Heesch, Netherlands
Probably a freshly emerged female. It's still very clean and undamaged and spent a lot of time with wings folded. It's a female because the male of this species (and any other hoverfly species) have eyes that touch each other (blend).

"Episyrphus balteatus", sometimes called the marmalade hoverfly, is a relatively small hoverfly of the Syrphidae family, widespread throughout the Palaearctic region, which covers Europe, North Asia, and North Africa.
Similar species: True Flies
By Ferdy Christant
All rights reserved
Uploaded May 31, 2022. Captured May 27, 2022 15:46.
comments (10)
With my 1:1 macro, which is 105mm so gives some working distance to the subject it's mostly OK. It's definitely more intimidating but it's not like I spook all subjects.
With my 2:1 macro, as used on this photo, I have to get far closer to the subject. Where spooking them is then more likely, a far bigger issue is that I simply can't reach the subject at all, as the diffuser blocks me, for example near bushes.
This last bit (2:1) was just a tryout, I don't often use it in the field, it's a very difficult lens to use.
For now, I think this diffuser would be most viable during night tours in our travel. Subjects tend to be stable and cooperative then.
Oh, and this one is on-camera. Posted 3 years ago, modified 3 years ago
I keep forgetting to send you a pic of it, but I'm mostly planning to use my diffuser that is somewhat similar in shape to yours, on mushrooms and indoor photography. Other than that, it's not practical for me in the field because it doesn't fold up and so would be annoying to carry when not in use. Plus, I crawl around too much in the woods and the size of the diffuser would be a problem. Hiking off-trail requires me to scamper and squeeze through rocks /over downed trees/through brambles/muck through swamps. I think my diffuser will be really useful for backyard photography or in more open settings, too. But, I'm most excited to try it on mushrooms. Posted 3 years ago
With mushrooms, I find off-camera flash, for example flash from the side to be quite beautiful. Mushrooms tend to not be super reflective most of the time so a giant diffuser is not strictly needed, although it would still improve shadows.
In any case, have fun experimenting! Posted 3 years ago
Anyway, I see no reason as to why it would not work. The only difference between flash and continuous lighting is that flash is more powerful, so with continuous lighting you need a slower shutter speed, which is fine for a stationary subject. Also, you can preview continuous light, whilst you can't preview flash. Posted 3 years ago, modified 3 years ago