
Dinomyrmex gigas - Major Worker (head detail)
Note: purchased specimen.
Here's a series of images documenting Dinomyrmex gigas, one of the largest ants in the world. This species is nocturnal, therefore only incidentally spotted by day.
This is a Major worker, sometimes just called "Major". Majors are sterile females tasked primarily as body guard for the rest of the colony when they go out at night to forage. Majors are significantly larger than minor workers, and have a heart-shaped massive head and giant mandables. They are described to grow to 28mm, whilst this one was even larger, at exactly 30mm.
These female soldiers alternate between deadly force and ritualistic violence. When defending against other species, it's total war leading to regular death. No time is wasted on mourning as a subsitute troup of Major follows.
However, when a Major meets another Major of the same species from a rival colony, something fascinating happens. They engage in ritual fights. They drum their feet in anticipation. As soon as one touches the other, it's game on, like boxers hitting first gloves. A ritual of intimidation follows, where antennae vibrate, mandibles are raised, and rapid front legs peddle like in a kangaroo fight.
The indivual to sustain the longest, wins. Yet only this round. The loser retreats to recover, clean and recharge. And then will return to the same tournament spot for another go at it. The animals will keep doing this for up to one month, probably because one realizes a lack of a end game.

''Dinomyrmex'' is a monotypic genus of ant containing the species ''Dinomyrmex gigas'' or giant forest ant. ''D. gigas'' is a large species of ant, native to Southeast Asian forests. It is one of the largest ants in existence, measuring in at 20.9 mm for normal workers, and 28.1 mm for the soldiers.
comments (8)
Not fun at all fact: 226 photos for this stack. Their heart-shaped head is super wide, so deep depth of field. Posted 4 years ago
- Magnification. The bigger the magnification, the smaller the depth of field. I'm in the range of 2:1 to 5:1 so it varies.
- Composition. For example an insect with the antennae coming at you may need 3 times more photos compared to a more flat subject.
That said, most photos are 50-100 images. At 5:1 some shots in the range of 150-300 images.
More images does take longer the complete the stack, but in all cases we're talking minutes. Stacking in software will also take a few minutes longer with more images. Overall, it's not a huge issue to have more images. Posted 4 years ago
Occasionally, a stack is ruined when the subject moves. Yes, even when dead. Could be a change in temperature, gravitational pull when weakly pinned, etc. Some people have described even specimens of years old moving during a stack.
It all leads to a somewhat philosophical conclusion: the concept of still or stable does not exist in the real world, every single thing constantly changes. Posted 4 years ago
Posted 4 years ago