JungleDragon is a nature and wildlife community for photographers, travellers and anyone who loves nature. We're genuine, free, ad-free and beautiful.

Join

Entomobrya multifasciata Didn't have much "luck" focusing on this one ... or should I say: My "strategy" failed miserably? ;o)  Anyway, just this "long distance" shot that has the critter recognizable enough to add the species ... Collembola,Entomobrya,Entomobrya multifasciata,Entomobryidae,Entomobryomorpha,Geotagged,Netherlands,Schiermonnikoog Click/tap to enlarge PromotedSpecies introCountry intro

Entomobrya multifasciata

Didn't have much "luck" focusing on this one ... or should I say: My "strategy" failed miserably? ;o) Anyway, just this "long distance" shot that has the critter recognizable enough to add the species ...

    comments (14)

  1. Still really adorable! Posted 4 years ago
    1. Yes, fortunately my failure to get a better picture doesn't influence that (or I wouldn't dare take pictures of adorable cuties anymore) ;o) Posted 4 years ago
  2. I think it's actually well focused. It has the proper depth of field and key parts are in focus. Only a tad moved, yet that means in this case a movement of what....1 micrometer?

    Bottom line: species is very clear to see!
    Posted 4 years ago
    1. Yes, recognizability is okay - I was referring to the low resolution (cropped to "hd ready" 720 lines), but I just noticed that JD now seems to blow such low res images up to "full screen" so the casual observer might not notice? Posted 4 years ago
      1. You mean on the full screen image viewer? Yes, there it scales up the image to a minimum of 2048px wide, if I recall correctly. Posted 4 years ago
        1. Somehow I seem to remember seeing small images in full screen view every now and than, so I was surprised to see this one full screen ... did you change the settings recently? Posted 4 years ago
          1. No, haven't touched it in years. I do know what you mean, rarely I also see very tiny images. This is either due to the original image actually being tiny, alternatively it is possible that something got stuck in the process where JD resizes the original into various formats. Posted 4 years ago
        2. P.S. Here are some examples of low res originals that do not resize to full screen on my monitor (which is probably a good thing ;o)
          Eurygaster testudinaria L2 Eurygaster testudinaria looks a lot like E.maura, but has the tylus sunken between the jugae, more pointed shoulders and somewhat different lengths of antennae segments. On the nymphs these characters are not applicable, so nymphs are virtually impossible to ID, unless raised to adulthood(!!)<br />
This image is part of a series from 2nd stage nymph to imago:<br />
https://www.jungledragon.com/image/46700/eurygaster_testudinaria_l2.html<br />
https://www.jungledragon.com/image/46701/eurygaster_testudinaria_l3.html<br />
https://www.jungledragon.com/image/46702/eurygaster_testudinaria_l4.html<br />
https://www.jungledragon.com/image/46699/eurygaster_testudinaria_imago_teneral.html<br />
https://www.jungledragon.com/image/46698/eurygaster_testudinaria_imago.html<br />
 Eurygaster,Eurygaster testudinaria,Geotagged,Heteroptera,Netherlands,Scutelleridae,nl: Gewone pantserwants

          Harmonia axyridis vs Adalia decempuntata - size difference Depending on the number of spots developed, these two can look very similar on photographs. In the field it is hardly ever a problem as on average the two species differ sufficiently in size to not get them confused.  Adalia decempunctata,Coccinellidae,Coccinellinae,Coleoptera,Harmonia axyridis,Ladybird ID help,nl: Aziatisch lieveheersbeestje,nl: Tienstippelig lieveheersbeestje

          Melanocoryphus albomaculatus nymph Last instar nymph of species Melanocoryphus albomaculatus (Heteroptera: Lygaeidae) Lygaeidae,Melanocoryphus,Melanocoryphus albomaculatus,heteroptera,nl: Praalridderwants
          Posted 4 years ago, modified 4 years ago
          1. Just did some more checking. To start with the main image we were discussing, the original is indeed 1280 x 720. On the fullscreen image viewer ( https://www.jungledragon.com/image/105630/entomobrya_multifasciata.html/zoom ) it is shown exactly at that dimension, never larger, so it's not blown up. It can become smaller, if your screen is smaller than 1280 (smartphone, small tablet), but not bigger.

            On the page we're currently at, the image is shown as 1140 wide, so slightly shrunk. On this page (simply called the "photo page", non-full screen) the image is scaled inside a fixed width box. The width of the box depends on your screen/device, but on desktop it's always 1140.

            Hope this makes sense now :)
            Posted 4 years ago, modified 4 years ago
            1. Hmmmm, that's not what I'm seeing. I'm currently on a full hd (1920x1080) laptop screen. I took some screenshots to determine pixel sizes. On the photo page we're on the image currently is shown in a reduced size (of course) at something like 987x555 (roughly). But in the zoom view I get it presented at around 1600x900, which is larger than the original. Stranger yet: It even gives me the "load original" button ... suggesting the original is even larger (?) :-/
              I'll send you a screenshot by mail.
              Note however that it's probably a non-issue, it just made me wonder that you guys might be seeing it "larger than life" and hence not notice the low res that I was bashing myself about ;o)
              Posted 4 years ago
            2. Hi Ferdy,
              just to let you know: Your suggestion (by email) that the laptop this was happening on might have "zoom" level configured for the entire screen was spot on! Took me a while to find the setting *rolleyes*, as I never tinker with these things on Windoze and this happens to be a Win10 testing system. Makes the whole discussion a bit embarrassing, so sorry about that!
              Posted 4 years ago
              1. No worries, it's an easy thing to overlook, even more when you didn't actively set it yourself. Glad you found it. Posted 4 years ago
  3. I think it's a great shot! It perfectly shows off its adorability. Posted 4 years ago
    1. Thanks Christine - see remarks above ;o) Posted 4 years ago

Sign in or Join in order to comment.

Entomobrya multifasciata is a species of Springtail (Collembola) in the family Entomobryidae.

Similar species: Entomobryomorpha
Species identified by Pudding4brains
View Pudding4brains's profile

By Pudding4brains

Public Domain
Uploaded Dec 13, 2020. Captured in Rijspolder 20, 9166 RZ Schiermonnikoog, Netherlands.