JungleDragon is a nature and wildlife community for photographers, travellers and anyone who loves nature. We're genuine, free, ad-free and beautiful.

Join

Dicyrtoma dorsosignata, Heesch, Netherlands Update: Matty Berg has confirmed this is indeed a new species report for the Netherlands. We&#039;re discussing if specimen collection is possible, and possibly the find may be included in a new article.<br />
<br />
Update 2: Specimen collected and confirmed successfully:<br />
<figure class="photo"><a href="https://www.jungledragon.com/image/105252/dicyrtoma_dorsosignata_specimen_netherlands.html" title="Dicyrtoma dorsosignata (specimen), Netherlands"><img src="https://s3.amazonaws.com/media.jungledragon.com/images/2/105252_thumb.jpg?AWSAccessKeyId=05GMT0V3GWVNE7GGM1R2&Expires=1759968010&Signature=a5UNxKQ1Jf9jm4bo98idH4kA21I%3D" width="68" height="152" alt="Dicyrtoma dorsosignata (specimen), Netherlands Last week, I accidentally documented a springtail species never reported before in the Netherlands:<br />
https://www.jungledragon.com/image/104964/dicyrtoma_dorsosignata_heesch_netherlands.html<br />
The species was identified as Dicyrtoma dorsosignata by Frans Janssens (https://www.collembola.org/). Frans passed on the observation to Matty Berg. Matty is a professor at the Vrije Universiteit Van Amsterdam, and the leading expert on soil fauna and specifically springtails in the Netherlands. In a recent interview, when asked who else is structurally finding, identifying and researching springtails: &quot;It&#039;s just me&quot;.<br />
<br />
Whilst Matty agreed with Frans&#039; species ID based on my photo, he still wanted to formalize it as a new addition to dutch fauna by trying to collect a specimen. As I had no idea that it was a special observation during the photography, I had returned the live specimen to the garden. <br />
<br />
Last Saturday, Matty came to our home, to try and find a fresh specimen. This post discusses results and is written in honor of his work.<br />
<br />
One thing I was eager to learn is how he finds and collects specimens. It turns out to be simple, yet innovative and extremely effective. A large white tray is used to catch them, the white being a useful contrast to see the subjects. Method 1 to fill the tray is to heavily shake plants and bushes whilst keeping the tray under it. Method 2 places piles of dry/rotting leafs from the lawn on a filter, and then shaking the filter heavily, so that the subjects fall in the tray beneath.<br />
<br />
As I saw the tray filling up, I cringed at how I didn&#039;t think of this earlier. We&#039;re in an urban garden, in December, yet there&#039;s tons of stuff in the tray. Springtails, but also spiders, crickets, net-winged insects, all kinds of stuff I wasn&#039;t expecting. The method is so obvious in hindsight, as it is obvious that I&#039;m not an entomologist. The only thing against this method is that it&#039;s disruptive, it displaces almost anything living on the plant. This makes sense for the purpose of research, which needs to be effective, yet for photography subject selection I probably would be a bit more selective.<br />
<br />
The next part is innovative. Each time a tray was inspected, we&#039;d typically find many springtails, yet only 3-5 globular springtails, which is what the target was. How do you collect such a tiny creature? Here&#039;s how:<br />
<br />
https://images3.persgroep.net/rcs/jxLctFq3qZQAa1KomxU5uw9JVwk/diocontent/69958945/_crop/0/0/293/298/_fitwidth/763?appId=93a17a8fd81db0de025c8abd1cca1279&amp;quality=0.8<br />
<br />
With this self-made air tube, Matty gently sucks at the end of the tube in his mouth. On the other end of the tube is a small compartment, where they get stuck. Simple as it is, it is a very fast and touch-free way to isolate a springtail without damaging it. When the compartment is full, it&#039;s placed in a test tube.<br />
<br />
Surprisingly, no magnification tools are used at all, not even a magnifying glass. Just from the creature&#039;s profile and the way it mildly shines in daylight, Matty has a pretty good idea of what it is. A sign of experience. The above process was repeated for some 90 minutes. Matty was to do actual detailed inspection of the specimens collected back home, using a microscope. One day after his visit, he sent me this:<br />
<br />
Orchesella cincta: 13<br />
Orchesella villosa: 1<br />
Pogonognathellus flavesecens: 1<br />
Entomobrya multifasciata: 145<br />
Heteromurus major: 5<br />
Isotomurus maculatus: 2<br />
Sminthurinus elegans: 2<br />
Sminthurinus alpinus : 1<br />
Parisotoma notabilis: 5<br />
Proisotoma minuta: 1<br />
Entomobrya lanuginosa: 1<br />
Dicyrtomina ornata: 132<br />
Dicyrtomina saundersi: 43<br />
Dicyrtoma fusca: 11<br />
Dicyrtoma dorsosignata: 1<br />
<br />
This is next level trolling. So, out of 364 springtails collected, just bloody ONE is Dicyrtoma dorsosignata. And it&#039;s at the end of the list. What a cliffhanger. <br />
<br />
These microscope photos are by Matty, published with his permission. Note that I increased the contrast. They show different angles of the single Dicyrtoma dorsosignata specimen. Whilst I don&#039;t yet understand the key system, apparently the closeup of the furca shows characteristics unique to Dicyrtoma dorsosignata.<br />
<br />
And that closes this chapter. It&#039;s been fun and educational, gratitude to Frans, Matty and Arp for their help, education and excitement.  Dicyrtoma dorsosignata" /></a></figure><br />
Two weeks ago, I photographed my first springtail:<br />
<br />
<figure class="photo"><a href="https://www.jungledragon.com/image/104612/dicyrtomina_ornata_heesch_netherlands.html" title="Dicyrtomina ornata, Heesch, Netherlands"><img src="https://s3.amazonaws.com/media.jungledragon.com/images/2/104612_thumb.jpg?AWSAccessKeyId=05GMT0V3GWVNE7GGM1R2&Expires=1759968010&Signature=tPRtC2QVbP3jZs8M%2B0bGdq8kZuw%3D" width="200" height="134" alt="Dicyrtomina ornata, Heesch, Netherlands Our garden, little as it may be, has been a valuable source of extreme macro subjects thus far. Yet this being November, the insect world is bracing for winter. Except perhaps for...winter insects.<br />
<br />
If it wasn&#039;t for our new laser-pen-obsessed cat forcing me outside, I&#039;d had no business there. For no particular reason I figured to do another gaze in the mini pond that I had been ignoring for weeks. These are just buckets of water dug into the ground. I pretty much let nature figure out what to do with this habitat.<br />
<br />
Eye ball almost meeting the water line, I normally look into the water. To see if anything moves down below. Being this very close to the water line, I noticed something tiny sitting on the surface itself. Arthropod-like but too small to the naked eye to decipher anything else.<br />
<br />
I carefully poured it into a petri dish and took it inside. I had a quick look in the viewfinder and rejoiced: a springtail! <br />
<br />
I know they exist. They are likely the most numerous of any insect species in our garden, yet thus far I&#039;ve never consciously seen one, let alone capture one. Probably because I wasn&#039;t trying very hard, yet also because of their small size. They are easy to overlook and even if detected, standard macro photography (1:1) would struggle to capture them in detail, depending on which species it concerns:<br />
<br />
https://www.collembola.org/images/hopkin/2005/megmin01.jpg<br />
<br />
Both subjects are springtails. The small blob is a mere 0.25mm, the &quot;giant&quot; 6mm. The particular species on my photo has these dimensions:<br />
<br />
- body length (head to butt): 1.7mm<br />
- abdomen at widest point: 0.8mm<br />
- width of head, without antennae: 0.4mm<br />
<br />
As seen by the naked eye:<br />
https://www.jungledragon.com/image/104613/dicyrtomina_ornata_-_dimensions_heesch_netherlands.html<br />
Capturing this tiny subject is challenging in multiple ways:<br />
<br />
- As I needed a diagonal angle into the petri dish, I went without the macro rail. Handheld 5:1 macro photography is...interesting. <br />
<br />
- Despite the subject being so little, depth of field at 5:1 is still too tiny. It&#039;s about 0.25mm. So you can&#039;t get the entire subject in focus. Increasing aperture is no solution. This particular lens is useless beyond f/5.6, f/8 tops.<br />
<br />
- Resolving power. Whilst I&#039;m generally very happy with this lens, clearly it&#039;s unable to resolve fine details at this magnification. The eye, as an example, would be about 0.08mm in size yet still make up hundreds of pixels on the D850&#039;s high resolution sensor. This glass, and probably most glass, can&#039;t resolve details that fine. It&#039;s not a problem for the typical subject (0.5 - 1cm), but this is another league.<br />
<br />
Luckily, the subject was strangely compliant. It&#039;s alive and unharmed. It didn&#039;t respond to my intense focus light and heavy flash. This is the best I was able to produce on day 1. I&#039;ll share a few more day 1 shots later. They are far worse, yet I&#039;ll use other angles to discuss characteristics of the species. <br />
<br />
On day 2, I actually tried to stack this subject. Results of that are also still to come.<br />
<br />
As for species ID, likely this is Dicyrtomina ornata. One of 3 winter species looking somewhat similar (the others are Dicyrtomina saundersi and Dicyrtomina minuta), based on this most excellent resource:<br />
http://www.janvanduinen.nl/collembola_a.html<br />
<br />
The decisive key in this case is the subject having a uniform antennae color, which sets it apart from Dicyrtomina saundersi.<br />
<br />
Update: anatomy discussion here:<br />
<br />
https://www.jungledragon.com/image/104641/dicyrtomina_ornata_anatomy.html<br />
Stacked image from day 2:<br />
<br />
https://www.jungledragon.com/image/104643/dicyrtomina_ornata_-_full_subject_crop.html Dicyrtomina ornata,Europe,Extreme Macro,Netherlands,Springtail,World" /></a></figure><br />
<br />
...which I found on the water surface of a mini-pond in our back yard. A few days ago, I checked it again, and this time found 10 individuals. I first speculated perhaps wind got them into the pond, but now think they walk or fall into it from the edge, with no way to crawl out of it again. This morning I added some branches and leafs so that they do not get permanently trapped.<br />
<br />
As before, I collected them into a petri dish for inside photography.<br />
<br />
To my joy, the 10 individuals showed some diversity in appearance and size: probably multiple species as well as singular species at multiple instars. To solve the puzzle of which individual is which species, I contacted Frans Janssens, the man behind <a href="http://collembola.org/" rel="nofollow">http://collembola.org/</a>. This seems to be the ultimate in-depth springtail taxonomy reference that Frans has been working on longer than I exist, since 1976.<br />
<br />
I&#039;ll be sharing a series of photos from this session over the coming days, yet this particular one has some priority. It is speculated to be Dicyrtoma dorsosignata. According to Frans, this is intriguing as it is known thus far as a mediterranean species, typically reported from France, Portugal, Malta, etc. Now that it is online, we hope Matty Berg (the authority on this group in the Netherlands) will confirm it as a possible new species for the Netherlands.<br />
<br />
I&#039;ll conclude with some &quot;making of&quot; notes, for the interested. From the earlier session 2 weeks ago I learned that handheld 5:1 photography is extremely difficult, as is obvious. So for this 2nd session I experimented a bit with a proper support system:<br />
<a href="https://ibb.co/YNg8RXN" rel="nofollow">https://ibb.co/YNg8RXN</a><br />
<br />
The metal frame in the bottom is not a tripod, it&#039;s a light stand, the Manfrotto 003. You can&#039;t adjust the height of it, it&#039;s just a super solid stand. Very heavy, and stays in place. It&#039;s shockingly inexpensive given the material and quality. Normally, you&#039;d put an extension pole into the stand, and then add lights or light shapers (umbrellas) to it. <br />
<br />
Not this time. I added the spigot (the golden-colored connector, Manfrotto 013) after which you can put anything to it that accepts a standard thread size. In this case, I added a super heavy duty tripod head, the Manfrotto MHXPRO-BHQ2. I normally avoid recommending gear in this place, but gladly make an exception for this jewel. This ballhead tripod head allows for a massive 10kg of load. And it takes it effortlessly. Even when under heavy load, you have fine grained control over movement and friction, in any direction. The ball is fully enclosed and therefore there is no grease. Given the class it competes in, this product is inexpensive and an absolute top performer.<br />
<br />
With this support system in place, most of my own movement is negated. Not to mention that it takes a lot of weight out of my hands, making possible a longer session. Focusing at the proper depth still is a challenge. My main method here is to use focus peaking via the live view screen. This paints a red overlay at the area in focus. Yet is tiny in this situation. I&#039;ve learned that the beginning of their antennae is the proper focal point. Combined with f/8, there&#039;s a reasonable chance the head is in focus. Still about only 1 in 8 shots are passable this way, so the strategy is to just shoot lots and hope for the best.<br />
<br />
The last challenge is light. With the end of the lens almost hitting the water, it&#039;s tricky to light the front of the animal. In this case I used the Godox AK-R11 Dome and positioned it to the side of the petri dish. I don&#039;t even own a Godox flash, this is just a cheap yet useful accessory. Next, I place a very strong flash unit in front of it. This effectively floods the scene with light that is strong yet spread. At 5:1 combined with f/8, the effective aperture is f/48. This means the Speedlight needs to fire at full power. Since no speedlight can sustain that for any length of time, I used a flash power pack.<br />
<br />
For now I have tentatively identified it as Dicyrtoma dorsosignata. I will update this post once experts have confirmed/rejected this proposal. Dicyrtoma dorsosignata,Europe,Extreme Macro,Fall,Geotagged,Netherlands,Springtail,World Click/tap to enlarge PromotedSpecies introCountry intro

Dicyrtoma dorsosignata, Heesch, Netherlands

Update: Matty Berg has confirmed this is indeed a new species report for the Netherlands. We're discussing if specimen collection is possible, and possibly the find may be included in a new article.

Update 2: Specimen collected and confirmed successfully:

Dicyrtoma dorsosignata (specimen), Netherlands Last week, I accidentally documented a springtail species never reported before in the Netherlands:<br />
https://www.jungledragon.com/image/104964/dicyrtoma_dorsosignata_heesch_netherlands.html<br />
The species was identified as Dicyrtoma dorsosignata by Frans Janssens (https://www.collembola.org/). Frans passed on the observation to Matty Berg. Matty is a professor at the Vrije Universiteit Van Amsterdam, and the leading expert on soil fauna and specifically springtails in the Netherlands. In a recent interview, when asked who else is structurally finding, identifying and researching springtails: "It's just me".<br />
<br />
Whilst Matty agreed with Frans' species ID based on my photo, he still wanted to formalize it as a new addition to dutch fauna by trying to collect a specimen. As I had no idea that it was a special observation during the photography, I had returned the live specimen to the garden. <br />
<br />
Last Saturday, Matty came to our home, to try and find a fresh specimen. This post discusses results and is written in honor of his work.<br />
<br />
One thing I was eager to learn is how he finds and collects specimens. It turns out to be simple, yet innovative and extremely effective. A large white tray is used to catch them, the white being a useful contrast to see the subjects. Method 1 to fill the tray is to heavily shake plants and bushes whilst keeping the tray under it. Method 2 places piles of dry/rotting leafs from the lawn on a filter, and then shaking the filter heavily, so that the subjects fall in the tray beneath.<br />
<br />
As I saw the tray filling up, I cringed at how I didn't think of this earlier. We're in an urban garden, in December, yet there's tons of stuff in the tray. Springtails, but also spiders, crickets, net-winged insects, all kinds of stuff I wasn't expecting. The method is so obvious in hindsight, as it is obvious that I'm not an entomologist. The only thing against this method is that it's disruptive, it displaces almost anything living on the plant. This makes sense for the purpose of research, which needs to be effective, yet for photography subject selection I probably would be a bit more selective.<br />
<br />
The next part is innovative. Each time a tray was inspected, we'd typically find many springtails, yet only 3-5 globular springtails, which is what the target was. How do you collect such a tiny creature? Here's how:<br />
<br />
https://images3.persgroep.net/rcs/jxLctFq3qZQAa1KomxU5uw9JVwk/diocontent/69958945/_crop/0/0/293/298/_fitwidth/763?appId=93a17a8fd81db0de025c8abd1cca1279&quality=0.8<br />
<br />
With this self-made air tube, Matty gently sucks at the end of the tube in his mouth. On the other end of the tube is a small compartment, where they get stuck. Simple as it is, it is a very fast and touch-free way to isolate a springtail without damaging it. When the compartment is full, it's placed in a test tube.<br />
<br />
Surprisingly, no magnification tools are used at all, not even a magnifying glass. Just from the creature's profile and the way it mildly shines in daylight, Matty has a pretty good idea of what it is. A sign of experience. The above process was repeated for some 90 minutes. Matty was to do actual detailed inspection of the specimens collected back home, using a microscope. One day after his visit, he sent me this:<br />
<br />
Orchesella cincta: 13<br />
Orchesella villosa: 1<br />
Pogonognathellus flavesecens: 1<br />
Entomobrya multifasciata: 145<br />
Heteromurus major: 5<br />
Isotomurus maculatus: 2<br />
Sminthurinus elegans: 2<br />
Sminthurinus alpinus : 1<br />
Parisotoma notabilis: 5<br />
Proisotoma minuta: 1<br />
Entomobrya lanuginosa: 1<br />
Dicyrtomina ornata: 132<br />
Dicyrtomina saundersi: 43<br />
Dicyrtoma fusca: 11<br />
Dicyrtoma dorsosignata: 1<br />
<br />
This is next level trolling. So, out of 364 springtails collected, just bloody ONE is Dicyrtoma dorsosignata. And it's at the end of the list. What a cliffhanger. <br />
<br />
These microscope photos are by Matty, published with his permission. Note that I increased the contrast. They show different angles of the single Dicyrtoma dorsosignata specimen. Whilst I don't yet understand the key system, apparently the closeup of the furca shows characteristics unique to Dicyrtoma dorsosignata.<br />
<br />
And that closes this chapter. It's been fun and educational, gratitude to Frans, Matty and Arp for their help, education and excitement.  Dicyrtoma dorsosignata

Two weeks ago, I photographed my first springtail:

Dicyrtomina ornata, Heesch, Netherlands Our garden, little as it may be, has been a valuable source of extreme macro subjects thus far. Yet this being November, the insect world is bracing for winter. Except perhaps for...winter insects.<br />
<br />
If it wasn't for our new laser-pen-obsessed cat forcing me outside, I'd had no business there. For no particular reason I figured to do another gaze in the mini pond that I had been ignoring for weeks. These are just buckets of water dug into the ground. I pretty much let nature figure out what to do with this habitat.<br />
<br />
Eye ball almost meeting the water line, I normally look into the water. To see if anything moves down below. Being this very close to the water line, I noticed something tiny sitting on the surface itself. Arthropod-like but too small to the naked eye to decipher anything else.<br />
<br />
I carefully poured it into a petri dish and took it inside. I had a quick look in the viewfinder and rejoiced: a springtail! <br />
<br />
I know they exist. They are likely the most numerous of any insect species in our garden, yet thus far I've never consciously seen one, let alone capture one. Probably because I wasn't trying very hard, yet also because of their small size. They are easy to overlook and even if detected, standard macro photography (1:1) would struggle to capture them in detail, depending on which species it concerns:<br />
<br />
https://www.collembola.org/images/hopkin/2005/megmin01.jpg<br />
<br />
Both subjects are springtails. The small blob is a mere 0.25mm, the "giant" 6mm. The particular species on my photo has these dimensions:<br />
<br />
- body length (head to butt): 1.7mm<br />
- abdomen at widest point: 0.8mm<br />
- width of head, without antennae: 0.4mm<br />
<br />
As seen by the naked eye:<br />
https://www.jungledragon.com/image/104613/dicyrtomina_ornata_-_dimensions_heesch_netherlands.html<br />
Capturing this tiny subject is challenging in multiple ways:<br />
<br />
- As I needed a diagonal angle into the petri dish, I went without the macro rail. Handheld 5:1 macro photography is...interesting. <br />
<br />
- Despite the subject being so little, depth of field at 5:1 is still too tiny. It's about 0.25mm. So you can't get the entire subject in focus. Increasing aperture is no solution. This particular lens is useless beyond f/5.6, f/8 tops.<br />
<br />
- Resolving power. Whilst I'm generally very happy with this lens, clearly it's unable to resolve fine details at this magnification. The eye, as an example, would be about 0.08mm in size yet still make up hundreds of pixels on the D850's high resolution sensor. This glass, and probably most glass, can't resolve details that fine. It's not a problem for the typical subject (0.5 - 1cm), but this is another league.<br />
<br />
Luckily, the subject was strangely compliant. It's alive and unharmed. It didn't respond to my intense focus light and heavy flash. This is the best I was able to produce on day 1. I'll share a few more day 1 shots later. They are far worse, yet I'll use other angles to discuss characteristics of the species. <br />
<br />
On day 2, I actually tried to stack this subject. Results of that are also still to come.<br />
<br />
As for species ID, likely this is Dicyrtomina ornata. One of 3 winter species looking somewhat similar (the others are Dicyrtomina saundersi and Dicyrtomina minuta), based on this most excellent resource:<br />
http://www.janvanduinen.nl/collembola_a.html<br />
<br />
The decisive key in this case is the subject having a uniform antennae color, which sets it apart from Dicyrtomina saundersi.<br />
<br />
Update: anatomy discussion here:<br />
<br />
https://www.jungledragon.com/image/104641/dicyrtomina_ornata_anatomy.html<br />
Stacked image from day 2:<br />
<br />
https://www.jungledragon.com/image/104643/dicyrtomina_ornata_-_full_subject_crop.html Dicyrtomina ornata,Europe,Extreme Macro,Netherlands,Springtail,World


...which I found on the water surface of a mini-pond in our back yard. A few days ago, I checked it again, and this time found 10 individuals. I first speculated perhaps wind got them into the pond, but now think they walk or fall into it from the edge, with no way to crawl out of it again. This morning I added some branches and leafs so that they do not get permanently trapped.

As before, I collected them into a petri dish for inside photography.

To my joy, the 10 individuals showed some diversity in appearance and size: probably multiple species as well as singular species at multiple instars. To solve the puzzle of which individual is which species, I contacted Frans Janssens, the man behind http://collembola.org/. This seems to be the ultimate in-depth springtail taxonomy reference that Frans has been working on longer than I exist, since 1976.

I'll be sharing a series of photos from this session over the coming days, yet this particular one has some priority. It is speculated to be Dicyrtoma dorsosignata. According to Frans, this is intriguing as it is known thus far as a mediterranean species, typically reported from France, Portugal, Malta, etc. Now that it is online, we hope Matty Berg (the authority on this group in the Netherlands) will confirm it as a possible new species for the Netherlands.

I'll conclude with some "making of" notes, for the interested. From the earlier session 2 weeks ago I learned that handheld 5:1 photography is extremely difficult, as is obvious. So for this 2nd session I experimented a bit with a proper support system:
https://ibb.co/YNg8RXN

The metal frame in the bottom is not a tripod, it's a light stand, the Manfrotto 003. You can't adjust the height of it, it's just a super solid stand. Very heavy, and stays in place. It's shockingly inexpensive given the material and quality. Normally, you'd put an extension pole into the stand, and then add lights or light shapers (umbrellas) to it.

Not this time. I added the spigot (the golden-colored connector, Manfrotto 013) after which you can put anything to it that accepts a standard thread size. In this case, I added a super heavy duty tripod head, the Manfrotto MHXPRO-BHQ2. I normally avoid recommending gear in this place, but gladly make an exception for this jewel. This ballhead tripod head allows for a massive 10kg of load. And it takes it effortlessly. Even when under heavy load, you have fine grained control over movement and friction, in any direction. The ball is fully enclosed and therefore there is no grease. Given the class it competes in, this product is inexpensive and an absolute top performer.

With this support system in place, most of my own movement is negated. Not to mention that it takes a lot of weight out of my hands, making possible a longer session. Focusing at the proper depth still is a challenge. My main method here is to use focus peaking via the live view screen. This paints a red overlay at the area in focus. Yet is tiny in this situation. I've learned that the beginning of their antennae is the proper focal point. Combined with f/8, there's a reasonable chance the head is in focus. Still about only 1 in 8 shots are passable this way, so the strategy is to just shoot lots and hope for the best.

The last challenge is light. With the end of the lens almost hitting the water, it's tricky to light the front of the animal. In this case I used the Godox AK-R11 Dome and positioned it to the side of the petri dish. I don't even own a Godox flash, this is just a cheap yet useful accessory. Next, I place a very strong flash unit in front of it. This effectively floods the scene with light that is strong yet spread. At 5:1 combined with f/8, the effective aperture is f/48. This means the Speedlight needs to fire at full power. Since no speedlight can sustain that for any length of time, I used a flash power pack.

For now I have tentatively identified it as Dicyrtoma dorsosignata. I will update this post once experts have confirmed/rejected this proposal.

    comments (34)

  1. Wow! I'm glad you went back for a second look! And keep us updated on whether this ID pans out! That is so exciting! Posted 4 years ago
    1. Also, super nice that you gave these cuties a way out of the water! Posted 4 years ago
      1. Thanks. The tip was from Frans. Although I could have known it's not their normal habitat, I didn't know if it was harmful for them to be there. I suppose they also can't use their spring mechanism on water. Which in turn could explain why they were so cooperative.

        Yesterday I found one in proper habitat, on a rotting leaf. I figured to pick up the leaf for a better position yet the individual jumped out of sight. I suppose that would be normal and proper behavior. You'll also notice that almost all springtail photos online are taken directly in the field.

        Everything makes sense in hindsight :)
        Posted 4 years ago
    2. Thanks, I definitely will.

      I think you may also like the group shot. For some reason, all 10 individuals kept drifting to the middle of the petri dish, so I managed to capture all 10 at once, it's a pretty funny shot.
      Posted 4 years ago
      1. Yes! I would love to see that! Posted 4 years ago
        1. Dicyrtoma fusca + Dicyrtoma dorsosignata + Dicyrtomina ornata Here's the value pack, bulk discount shot of last weekend's springtail session. It shows all 10 individuals collected in a petri dish in a single 5:1 shot, cropped. I didn't even position them, they drifted to the middle on their own. I did take some 50 shots to get them aligned and somewhat in focus. Kind of like a group shot of people, always somebody blinking.<br />
<br />
Let's discuss species, with credit to Frans Jansen for the help (http://collembola.org/). <br />
<br />
In the bottom right corner, the dark red/purple individual is Dicyrtoma fusca. It is significantly larger than the others. Here it is isolated:<br />
<br />
https://www.jungledragon.com/image/104971/dicyrtoma_fusca_lateral_netherlands.html<br />
https://www.jungledragon.com/image/104974/dicyrtoma_fusca_frontal_netherlands.html<br />
At 9 o' clock, you see a pair of muddy green/yellow individuals with a distinctive pattern. This is Dicyrtoma dorsosignata, which as of yesterday is confirmed to be the first known report of the species in the Netherlands:<br />
<br />
https://www.jungledragon.com/image/104964/dicyrtoma_dorsosignata_heesch_netherlands.html<br />
All 7 remaining individuals are the commonly found Dicyrtomina ornata, at different stages in their life cycle. Simplified: the larger the older, the darker the older. <br />
<br />
Another interesting thing I learned from Frans is the taxonomy history, and how this affects naming. As you can see from my photo, a singular species can have a wildly different appearance based on its life stage. Early taxonomists sometimes categorized them (incorrectly) as a separate species. For example, this one...<br />
<br />
https://www.jungledragon.com/image/104612/dicyrtomina_ornata_heesch_netherlands.html<br />
...was once considered to be the species Forma couloni. Then, taxonomists realized it really is a particular variant of Dicyrtomina ornata instead. To fix this mistake, they use the old (incorrect) species name and reuse that name to name the variant. The above photo therefore shows a Dicyrtomina ornata forma couloni. Which you can read as "variant of Dicyrtomina ornata, once considered as species forma couloni".<br />
<br />
Collembola usually have 5 juvenile instars, and several adult instars, with females having more instars than males.<br />
<br />
As said, credit to Frans for this info. Europe,Extreme Macro,Netherlands,Springtail,World
          Posted 4 years ago
    3. Update: it's a positive first report! Posted 4 years ago
  2. WOW Ferdy! First reaction was : Great! Ferdy has taken it upon him to shoot some springtails ... then it sunk in ... "dorsowhatsum"? Huh? Dunno that ... *scratchingmyhead*
    Friggin' excellent find Ferdy! Very curious to see what Matty has to say. Be aware that he'll probably need some specimen in alcohol though for definite confirmation of a new species for our Fauna. Maybe best make sure you keep a few while you're waiting for his reaction.
    Very pretty addition to the Dutch springtails to boot!
    Well done mate :o)
    Posted 4 years ago
    1. Thanks so much, Arp, this truly is a case of beginner's luck. I'm afraid I don't have the specimens, I released them back into the garden after the shoot. For now would be happy to learn if the species is correct, so that it's at least an informal report. Posted 4 years ago
    2. Update: heard back from Matty, this is a positive first report of the species. We're discussing how to organize specimen collection. Posted 4 years ago
      1. Excellent :o) Congrats! If you see Matty, say hello for me! Posted 4 years ago
        1. Thanks. And lol, of course you know the man. Should have expected that. If so, you may be interested to know that by chance, he was already working on a brand new article on Symphypleona. Reason being there's more new reports of yet even different species. Hope I'm not telling too much. Posted 4 years ago
          1. No, a few of these have also passed on the forum at waarneming over the past year or so. The availability to the masses of photo equipment suitable for documenting springtails at affordable prices makes for many more "discoveries" than the traditional field work by only a handful of experts, I suppose ;o) Posted 4 years ago
            1. Makes sense. I realize they're not rare in any way, just hardly documented.

              Still a slight surprise you did not see this one pass by at waarneming? I imagine it has to be somewhat common. Reason for claiming that is because our garden isn't exactly a hotspot of biodiversity. In an urban area surrounded by large agriculture. Garden was completely renewed 3 years ago and we've refilled the boundaries with new off-the-shelf soil 3 times now. Makes me wonder if that's how they ended up here, maybe I just accidentally purchased them :)
              Posted 4 years ago
              1. > maybe I just accidentally purchased them :)

                Yes, that's a very real possibility - many, many species get transported in the soil of plants imported from other areas. Some survive and (temporarily) sustain populations until a harsh winter kills them off ... or not.
                Posted 4 years ago
        2. I passed the greeting to him. He immediately remembered you, said it's been a while since you talked. Nice update on specimen collection:

          Dicyrtoma dorsosignata (specimen), Netherlands Last week, I accidentally documented a springtail species never reported before in the Netherlands:<br />
https://www.jungledragon.com/image/104964/dicyrtoma_dorsosignata_heesch_netherlands.html<br />
The species was identified as Dicyrtoma dorsosignata by Frans Janssens (https://www.collembola.org/). Frans passed on the observation to Matty Berg. Matty is a professor at the Vrije Universiteit Van Amsterdam, and the leading expert on soil fauna and specifically springtails in the Netherlands. In a recent interview, when asked who else is structurally finding, identifying and researching springtails: "It's just me".<br />
<br />
Whilst Matty agreed with Frans' species ID based on my photo, he still wanted to formalize it as a new addition to dutch fauna by trying to collect a specimen. As I had no idea that it was a special observation during the photography, I had returned the live specimen to the garden. <br />
<br />
Last Saturday, Matty came to our home, to try and find a fresh specimen. This post discusses results and is written in honor of his work.<br />
<br />
One thing I was eager to learn is how he finds and collects specimens. It turns out to be simple, yet innovative and extremely effective. A large white tray is used to catch them, the white being a useful contrast to see the subjects. Method 1 to fill the tray is to heavily shake plants and bushes whilst keeping the tray under it. Method 2 places piles of dry/rotting leafs from the lawn on a filter, and then shaking the filter heavily, so that the subjects fall in the tray beneath.<br />
<br />
As I saw the tray filling up, I cringed at how I didn't think of this earlier. We're in an urban garden, in December, yet there's tons of stuff in the tray. Springtails, but also spiders, crickets, net-winged insects, all kinds of stuff I wasn't expecting. The method is so obvious in hindsight, as it is obvious that I'm not an entomologist. The only thing against this method is that it's disruptive, it displaces almost anything living on the plant. This makes sense for the purpose of research, which needs to be effective, yet for photography subject selection I probably would be a bit more selective.<br />
<br />
The next part is innovative. Each time a tray was inspected, we'd typically find many springtails, yet only 3-5 globular springtails, which is what the target was. How do you collect such a tiny creature? Here's how:<br />
<br />
https://images3.persgroep.net/rcs/jxLctFq3qZQAa1KomxU5uw9JVwk/diocontent/69958945/_crop/0/0/293/298/_fitwidth/763?appId=93a17a8fd81db0de025c8abd1cca1279&quality=0.8<br />
<br />
With this self-made air tube, Matty gently sucks at the end of the tube in his mouth. On the other end of the tube is a small compartment, where they get stuck. Simple as it is, it is a very fast and touch-free way to isolate a springtail without damaging it. When the compartment is full, it's placed in a test tube.<br />
<br />
Surprisingly, no magnification tools are used at all, not even a magnifying glass. Just from the creature's profile and the way it mildly shines in daylight, Matty has a pretty good idea of what it is. A sign of experience. The above process was repeated for some 90 minutes. Matty was to do actual detailed inspection of the specimens collected back home, using a microscope. One day after his visit, he sent me this:<br />
<br />
Orchesella cincta: 13<br />
Orchesella villosa: 1<br />
Pogonognathellus flavesecens: 1<br />
Entomobrya multifasciata: 145<br />
Heteromurus major: 5<br />
Isotomurus maculatus: 2<br />
Sminthurinus elegans: 2<br />
Sminthurinus alpinus : 1<br />
Parisotoma notabilis: 5<br />
Proisotoma minuta: 1<br />
Entomobrya lanuginosa: 1<br />
Dicyrtomina ornata: 132<br />
Dicyrtomina saundersi: 43<br />
Dicyrtoma fusca: 11<br />
Dicyrtoma dorsosignata: 1<br />
<br />
This is next level trolling. So, out of 364 springtails collected, just bloody ONE is Dicyrtoma dorsosignata. And it's at the end of the list. What a cliffhanger. <br />
<br />
These microscope photos are by Matty, published with his permission. Note that I increased the contrast. They show different angles of the single Dicyrtoma dorsosignata specimen. Whilst I don't yet understand the key system, apparently the closeup of the furca shows characteristics unique to Dicyrtoma dorsosignata.<br />
<br />
And that closes this chapter. It's been fun and educational, gratitude to Frans, Matty and Arp for their help, education and excitement.  Dicyrtoma dorsosignata
          Posted 4 years ago, modified 4 years ago
          1. Thanks Ferdy - yes, it has been way too long since I've met with any people for fieldwork :-/ Crazy two years ... there was a field trip with the Opiliones-Workgroup just a few weeks ago that I would have really liked to attend, but no chance time-wise. 'Been working 90-100 hrs for the past 6-8 weeks or so. But that's done now, at least for a while, so I hope to take some time off and finally manage to write some articles that have been in the pipeline for way too long too ... Posted 4 years ago
            1. That's a hideous workload! I won't ask why but hope you don't have to endure it for long and that you get some well deserved time to enjoy other things. All the best! Posted 4 years ago
              1. No worries, the bulk of that job is done now and it will allow me to take it easier for a few months ahead, so looking forward to that ... and just started with a short trip to Schiermonnikoog, so all's well :o) Posted 4 years ago
                1. Good to hear, enjoy! Posted 4 years ago
  3. They are lovely! And, good deed with giving them a way out. Posted 4 years ago
    1. Thanks! Should have fixed that earlier, it's probably not the first insect to drown this way. Ponds are new to me, you live and learn. Posted 4 years ago
      1. It's fixed now, at least :). The critters will thank you. Posted 4 years ago
        1. Most will, these may not. Just got word it's a positive new species, so this pair may end up in alcohol if we manage to find them again :) Posted 4 years ago
          1. Awesome!! A new species in your little pond. Fantastic! Posted 4 years ago
  4. How exciting to find a new species in your location, congratulations on your wonderful and important contribution Ferdy. Much respect for all specialists who have the passion and devote their time to such studies across flora and fauna, enabling you to make progress, assess and identify/place these delightful little creatures. Posted 4 years ago
    1. Thank you for the encouragement, Ruth! It could be my increased interest in the topic, yet it seems wherever I look I'm seeing signs of an increased interest in what they call soil fauna. A largely unexplored world. Posted 4 years ago
  5. I just saw your images have made it to Frans' website, documenting the species for the Netherlands - congrats again! :o) Posted 4 years ago
    1. Thanks, didn't know. Ouch, that's a deep crop, but I understand why. Posted 4 years ago
    2. Figured you might enjoy this:
      Posted 4 years ago
  6. Hej Ferdy,
    just saw that Jan van Duinen has found the species too (in IJsselmuiden)
    https://www.flickr.com/photos/fotos-janvanduinen/50697969771/
    http://www.janvanduinen.nl/collembola_a.html#46
    (same location where Henri had found it, so Jan went to find it there, looks like)
    Posted 4 years ago
    1. Thanks for sharing! The very similar timing yet still having multiple locations is interesting. Also did not know the species looks that variable. Posted 4 years ago
      1. Yes, leave to Jan to notice and document the variability :o)
        As for timing and location:
        In the forum discussion on waarneming Henk Soepenberg dug up yet another observation from Soest in 2019(!)
        https://forum.waarneming.nl/index.php/topic,476600.msg2437217.html#msg2437217
        https://waarneming.nl/photos/24391052/
        Posted 4 years ago
        1. Statistically it makes sense to me, it would be absurdly unlikely for it to not be among us for a while already, or for them to pop up in multiple places at once, out of nowhere.

          I still don't understand the keys though. In Matty's email he discussed the hairs (not the correct term) of the furcula being important in identification, and how it differs from others in the genus. Yet it also seems to be pre-identified based on sight alone, mostly based on what I call a barcode butt :)
          Posted 4 years ago

Sign in or Join in order to comment.

Dicyrtoma dorsosignata is a globular springtail in the Dicyrtoma genus.

Similar species: Symphypleona
Species identified by Ferdy Christant
View Ferdy Christant's profile

By Ferdy Christant

All rights reserved
Uploaded Nov 29, 2020. Captured Nov 27, 2020 15:09 in Beemdstraat 8, 5384 LB Heesch, Netherlands.
  • NIKON D850
  • f/1.2
  • 1/500s
  • ISO64
  • 50mm